In Security Theater, Part 1: The Illusion of Protection in Cybersecurity, we examined the roots of security theater — how denial, dazzling marketing, and a heavy dose of technobabble have created an industry more focused on appearances than actual protection. Vendors continue to install steel doors on straw houses and call it security.
But nowhere is this illusion more dangerous than in the operational technology (OT) environment. OT systems have unique requirements: limited memory, physical constraints, and critical uptime demands. They are not designed to accommodate bloated IT tools retrofitted for a world they were never built to serve.
In this second part, we move from theory to practice. We will explore how security theater manifests in real-world OT environments and how Crytica’s RDA system breaks the illusion — replacing theater with threat detection designed for the realities of OT.
Security Theater in Operational Technology
The OT security environment, with operational demands that differ sharply from those of IT, presents a set of unique — and often unaddressed — security requirements. These include:
- The small size and resource constraints of the devices being protected
- The critical uptime and high-performance demands of the systems involved
- The physical locations and operational environments of the devices being protected
Unfortunately, almost all cybersecurity systems were designed to serve the IT world. Now, as the awareness grows about the looming threats to the OT environment, traditional IT cybersecurity systems are being retrofitted to protect the OT world. This is mostly an exercise in futility.
Common Forms of Security Theater in Critical Infrastructure
What does security theater look like on the ground? Critical infrastructure and OT environments are particularly susceptible to these manifestations of security theater:
- Compliance-first mindset – Passing an audit might keep regulators at bay, but it will not stop malware. Compliance frameworks are guidelines, not defenses. Treating them as the end goal is like locking the front door and leaving the windows wide open.
- Over-reliance on buzzwords – Vendors are more than happy to sell “AI-powered,” “next-gen,” and “autonomous” solutions. But how many of these tools have been tested — really tested — in OT environments? Can they even run on legacy systems? Can they detect zero-day malware threats without breaking the network?
- Perimeter-focused defenses: Firewalls, VPNs, and segmentation are important security components, but they are not sufficient on their own. A secured perimeter does not guarantee protection of the systems inside of the perimeter, especially when many modern breaches originate from within. Supply chain compromise, insider threats, lateral movement, as well as encrypted malware and componentized malware — these have no respect for walls.
The Real Costs of Security Theater
Security theater isn’t just a philosophical failure — it’s a material one. In OT environments, where uptime is critical and margin for error is slim, the illusion of protection can be as dangerous as no protection at all.
Tools designed to satisfy IT frameworks rarely detect internal anomalies, device-level manipulations, or breaches in semi-isolated systems. Instead, they redirect attention to what’s easily measured, not what’s actually at risk.
What follows are real-world consequences: detection blind spots, operational disruption, and the financial waste of investing in security tools that do not fit the OT world.
Blind Spots in Threat Detection
Security theater focuses attention on what is visible — not what is vulnerable — creating dangerous blind spots in critical infrastructure environments. Compliance dashboards, audit-ready reports, and outward-facing metrics provide a sense of control, but they often leave the core attack surface unmonitored and exposed.
In OT, this is particularly problematic. As most cybersecurity systems designed for the IT world cannot fit inside many OT devices, cybersecurity vendors have tended to promote “solutions” that monitor OT devices from the outside. They monitor metrics such as network traffic patterns and content, log files, and periodic queries to the device to inquire about its status.
However, especially with the advent of sophisticated AI-enabled malware, it has become entirely feasible for malicious code to emulate normal network traffic, generate bogus (yet seemingly legitimate) log files, and provide disingenuous responses to status queries. Simply put: if the detection is not inside the device, it cannot fully detect attacks against the device — and therefore, cannot fully protect it.
The reality is that IT solutions leave significant blind spots in the OT world. Threat actors exploit precisely these gaps — moving laterally through trusted connections, compromising unsegmented networks, or leveraging insider access in environments where traditional monitoring is weak or nonexistent.
Operational Disruption in Critical Infrastructure
In critical infrastructure, security must enhance operational resilience, not undermine it. Yet many security measures, implemented under the guise of best practice, introduce friction that directly impacts availability and performance.
OT environments are often built on legacy systems with limited flexibility. Cybersecurity tools that require heavy computational resources, frequent updates, or continuous connectivity simply do not fit. When these IT-centric tools are retrofitted for OT, they tend to cause delays, interrupt workflows, and compromise critical operations.
Operators are left navigating cumbersome protocols that slow response — or worse, bypassing them entirely just to keep systems running. In this context, security becomes a burden rather than a safeguard. True OT protection must be lightweight, unobtrusive, and fully aligned with operational realities — not imposed at the cost of functionality.
Financial Waste on Ineffective Solutions
Significant resources are routinely wasted on cybersecurity tools fundamentally incompatible with the demands of OT environments. Many were developed for IT systems, where bandwidth, processing power, and data flow are abundant. These cybersecurity tools also flood response teams with excessive alerts and false positives. As a result, many security teams tend to prioritize compliance over actionable insight, leaving critical vulnerabilities unaddressed.
A prime example of this misplaced investment is the growing reliance on AI-powered malware detection systems. While AI can be powerful in the right context, it is inherently probabilistic — dependent on statistical inference, pattern recognition, and predictive modeling. In OT environments, this is a recipe for failure.
Not only do AI systems lack reliable malware detection capabilities, they require high-volume data, substantial computing resources, and constant tuning. These conditions are rarely present in semi-isolated or resource-constrained environments. AI may assist in specific support roles, but not when treated as the primary detection engine. In practice, AI often adds impossible complexity while reducing actual security.
Breaking Through Security Theater: The Crytica RDA Advantage
Security theater thrives on complexity, delay, and illusion. Crytica’s Rapid Detection and Alert (RDA) system cuts through this to deliver what the industry needs: rapid, deterministic threat detection built for environments where traditional cybersecurity tools fail. Below are a few of the major features of RDA.
Minimal Resource Impact
Designed for highly efficient execution and with a code size of 100KB or less, RDA is optimized for low-memory, processor-constrained environments, including legacy PLCs, SCADA systems, and embedded devices. Unlike traditional IT security tools, RDA functions independently and enables rapid deployment without architectural overhaul. It operates with minimal system impact, continuously scanning without degrading operational performance.
Deterministic Detection at the Point of Injection
Most cybersecurity tools rely on pattern recognition or probabilistic models, which introduce threat detection delays and false positives. Crytica’s RDA system takes a fundamentally different approach. RDA employs deterministic algorithms to identify malware precisely at the point of injection, before it can execute, spread, or disrupt operations. In independent tests, RDA has consistently detected every malware attack launched into its environment, outperforming all tested competitors in both speed and reliability — and without generating false positives. As a result, RDA shrinks dwell time to an absolute minimum, closing the window attackers typically rely upon to escalate, propagate, and exploit.
Resilient, Self-Healing Architecture
RDA’s distributed component architecture ensures operational continuity, even under direct attack. Its components are designed to be disposable and easily replaceable. If a probe is compromised or taken offline, another can be rapidly and autonomously deployed, maintaining detection coverage without the need for manual intervention. With RDA’s self-healing model, the protected systems remain protected, even during an active breach. Such resilience is crucial for critical infrastructure, where any disruption in security could lead to severe operational and public impacts.
Operation Without External Dependencies
While many security solutions depend on cloud-based analytics or centralized SIEMs, RDA is capable of operating locally and autonomously. It does not require continuous internet access, centralized control, or extensive data feeds. This architecture is ideal for semi-isolated, air-gapped, or restricted bandwidth environments, all of which are common in critical infrastructure. Detection events trigger immediate, actionable alerts. These are delivered directly to system operators or integrated into existing local response frameworks, which enables rapid remediation without relying on external entities, expert teams, or AI-assisted analysis layers.
Shattering the Security Theater Illusion
Security theater offers comfort, but comfort has no place in security, and especially not in the security of critical infrastructure. In environments where uptime is non-negotiable and threats are growing, superficial defenses are a liability. The false sense of security — built on a foundation of complexity, delay, and probabilistic guesswork — cannot meet the demands of the operational technology industry.
Crytica’s RDA system shatters the illusion. With deterministic threat detection, minimal operational footprint, and patented self-healing architecture, RDA delivers what critical infrastructure truly needs: real security.
It is not enough to appear secure. The stakes are too high. The “show” is over. Now, it’s time to defend.
Interested in learning more about Crytica’s RDA system? Reach out today to book a demo!
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)